| FEATURED ON THIS PAGE | |
 How SB 777 sexually indoctrinates |
Other existing threats to children |
| How SB 777 radically changed instruction |
Disturbing public school practices |
| Mandating indoctrination from age 5 |
"Good public schools" not so good |
| AB 394 indoctrinates through policies |
This page is lengthy but critical to understand the reality of new indoctrination laws and other perils of the public school system.
Parents alarmed about new homosexual indoctrination laws
There are new California laws that will eventually require all public school instruction and activities to positively portray transsexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality to children as young as kindergarten. Who should be in charge of what goes into the mind of your child... especially regarding moral standards... you or someone from the government?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SB 777 sexually indoctrinates through school instruction, activities
SB 777 PDF effectively promotes transsexual, bisexual, homosexual indoctrination of schoolchildren by requiring changes to all school instruction and school activities.
This law isn't about sex education. When fully implemented, SB 777 will affect everything on campus -- classroom instruction, instructional materials, textbooks, guest speakers, handouts, videos, sex education, drama, music, school assemblies, sports teams, homecoming games, school proms, school clubs, and much more.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
See how SB 777 radically changed school instruction
See it and believe it. Click to see the California Education Code before and after SB 777.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mandating sexual indoctrination from kindergarten on up
When you connect the dots PDF, you quickly understand that SB 777 prohibits all public school instruction and every school activity from “promoting a discriminatory bias” against (thus requiring positive depictions of) transsexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality to schoolchildren as young as five years old. SB 777 means children will be taught their “gender” is a matter of choice.
There is no “opt out” for parents. In fact, to "opt out" of SB 777, you would have to "opt out" of the entire school day. As stated above, when fully implemented, SB 777 will affect everything on campus -- classroom instruction, instructional materials, textbooks, guest speakers, handouts, videos, sex education, drama, music, school assemblies, sports teams, homecoming games, school proms, school clubs, and much more.
MUST-SEE VIDEO: Click to see real school sexual indoctrination in two other states
CONNECT THE DOTS: See what SB 777 really DOES PDF
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
AB 394 indoctrinates through school policies
AB 394 PDF effectively promotes transsexual, bisexual, homosexual indoctrination of students, parents, and teachers via “anti-harassment” materials.
While SB 777 would indoctrinate via school textbooks and activities, the text of AB 394 requires indoctrinatration of children and their parents via publications, postings on walls, curricula on school websites, and in handouts to take home. At every point of these new, on-campus “training” mandates, various sexual lifestyles, including transsexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality, would be positively portrayed to students as young as kindergarten.
Publications: Section 234.1(c) of the bill requires schools to “publicize antidiscrimination and harassment policies” and “the information shall be translated” into other languages.
Postings: Section 234.1(d) of the bill requires schools to “post antidiscrimination and antiharassment policies in all schools and offices, including staff lounges and pupil government offices.”
Curricula: Section 234.2 of the bill requires the California Department of Education to “display information on curricula” related to discrimination and harassment based on Penal Code, Section 422.55’s characteristics — specifically, transsexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality.
Handouts: Section 234.3 of the bill mandates that the California Department of Education to develop “a model handout” promoting these sexual lifestyles to students under the guise of “antidiscrimination” training.
AB 394 fails to define “harassment.” Could a parent who says marriage is only for a man and a woman in the presence of a lesbian teacher be found guilty of “harassment?” Could a student saying that babies are either boys or girls be labeled “harassment” by a transgender teacher? Poor drafting means this law will infringe upon free speech in unexpected ways.
SB 777 and AB 394 top of a long list of reasons why parents need to remove their children from government-controlled schools.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Other existing threats to children’s innocence in the public schools include:
Openly homosexual and transsexual teachers for children as young as kindergarten Pro-homosexuality "days of silence" and "diversity days" Pro-homosexuality-bisexual-transsexual "Gay-Straight Alliance" (GSA) clubs
influencing other children in 1 out of 3 public high schools in California
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More public school practices disturbing to many parents include:
No effective discipline Negative peer pressure Less safety and less academic success, on average, than private or home schools Distribution of condoms and birth control pills without parental consent "Confidential" abortion referrals and outside counseling without parental consent No teaching children how to truly avoid STDs/"abstinence-only" education prohibited Widespread rejection of religious and moral values Evolution training promoting unbelief in God
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
“Good public schools” not so good
Are public schools a "red light zone"? 12% of high schools "dropout factories"
Study debunks "good schools" myth Government schools increasingly anti-parent
Calif. public schools among worst Half of Calif. black, Latino students drop out
Half of LAUSD students drop out How public schools misspending taxpayer money
Public schools cause "dumb-ification"
Now that you know the severe problems, click here for solutions.